Thursday, July 19, 2012



Predicting The Career Potential For Nurse Educators In Online Education
by Alberta E. Gudes, BSN, RN

Statistics shows for years now that there is a growing shortage of nurses in the United States alone and this shortage is caused by colleges and universities that can no longer accommodate students to enroll in the nursing degree program in the traditional classroom setting. It is because there is also a prevalent scarcity of nurse educators across the academic world that offers healthcare studies like nursing (Penn, Wilson, & Rosseter, 2008).  According to Kariya (2003), “the annual market for distance learning is currently $4.5 billion, and it is “expected to grow to $11 billion by 2005”. Also, most agree that a rapidly aging RN workforce, the increasing demand for care, and an insufficient pipeline of nurses with master's and doctoral degrees are all contributors to the U.S. nursing shortage, which is expected to last at least through the year 2025 (Buerhaus, Staiger, & Auerbach, 2008).

Given the above scenario, this writer predicts that in the coming years, nurse educators in online education will dominate and grow expansively as this would be the most viable option for students to take, if colleges and universities would continue rejecting students to be accepted to attend the traditional face-to-face classroom setup (Buerhaus et. al., 2008).  Also, if forerunners and leaders of institutions offering online education will emphasize seriously quality online curriculum, supported with a robust technological infrastructure, and a stringent policy framework that would ensure that graduates in distance education would not be treated as inferior to the traditional ones.  Much more, if colleges and universities offering distance education would make available all other basic nursing courses like Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN), License Vocational Nurse (LVN), Nursing Assistant (NA), and the likes (http://onlinenursingdegreeguide.org/), then it would really shift the paradigms of nurse educators in online education, and definitely would transform their career potentials to be an irresistible societal trend that people would look up to.  

References

Buerhaus, P., Staiger, D.O. & Auerbach, D.I. (2008). The Future of the Nursing Workforce in the United States: Data, Trends and Implications. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Kariya, S. (2003) Online education expands and evolves. IEEE Spectrum. 40(5): 49-51.
Penn, B., Wilson, L., & Rosseter, R. (2008). Transitioning from nursing practice to a teaching role. Online Journal Of Issues In Nursing, 13(3),
Online Nursing Degree Guide, (n.d.), Guide to Online Nursing Degree and Schools, Retrieved on July 16, 2012 from http://onlinenursingdegreeguide.org/

Saturday, July 14, 2012



Should there be an additional criteria to become a distance nurse educator?
 
Having read a considerable literature on distance education thus far, this writer could categorically say that all criteria to become a distance nurse educator have all been elaborately discussed and covered in many posts already, whether it may be about the criteria on the competence of a nurse educator or the characteristics needed to become one, or even the needed technological infrastructure to support to the success of a distance nurse educator.  So many substantial topics and issues have already been conversed since the earlier days of this class that dissected the fundamentals of online learning, and truthfully there seems to be a replete of criteria of whatever there is to talk about already.

For the purpose of this paper, however, this writer would like to single out a point though it may not be a considered wholly an additional criteria. But, it is strongly believed that this can be a basis for recommendation among leaders of distance nurse educators to ponder deeply upon, and that in one way or the other, it may further help them optimistically in the undertaking of being a nurse educator.

A distance nurse educator should be able to intuitively develop the ability to decipher, manage and harness creatively or even by gut feel, all resources there is available including time coordination, in his/her disposal just for the sole purpose of being able to make him/her chosen style of pedagogy withstand and hurdle the barriers in order to become effective and efficient in the field[1].

An example on this is this writer’s own personal experience on how to harness resources to overcome communication barriers like distance. Having been enrolled in an online study in my home country prior to this one, this writer experienced a lot of difficulties at the start in coordinating with all stakeholders like teachers, classmates, and school administrators even in coordinating with natural factors like time difference of the United States and the Philippines, plus my own family and job related concerns here. This writer had to laboriously look for possible ways to be able to make all odds and ends meet (Odds and Ends, 2012). During the course of the process, this writer tried to utilize long distance calls through land line and mobile phones. This type of technology might not totally solve this writer’s difficulty; however it motivated her to look for another option to communicate better. This had led her to use the Skype facility (Waters, 2011) with the aid of a webcam technology. With a thorough organizing and collaborating with her online professors and classmates, this writer was able to do PowerPoint class reports and presentations and interactively engage with them. This was done over and over again and as a result, it even allowed this writer to achieve one unintended consequence like moving away the feeling of being isolated from her online classmates in the Philippines.

Putting this experience in context, if a faculty nurse educator feels isolated in online education, this writer disproves the barrier, which has been included as a societal trend, as eradicable. Like conducting online audio and video webinars would not only remove isolationism, but it would save time, money and effort for the hospitals, universities and students or participants without really undergoing travel risks and unnecessary expenses. Much more, it does not actually diminish the quality and effectiveness of its purpose.  

If a nurse educator would just really have to conscientiously look for a way to succeed in distance education (Casemore & Gallant, 2007), then it is just a matter of really putting himself/herself totally into it using his/her own creative mindset, intuition and at the very least, gut feel along every process. If this can be a valid additional criterion in the prism of nurse education, then this writer suggests that this concept be given a space to be considered a standard.

References

Casemore, R., & Gallant, M. (2007). Supervision: viewed from a distance. Therapy Today, 18(10), 44-45.
Odds and Ends. (2012). ED Review, 6.
Waters,S.(2011). The complete educator's guide to using skype effectively in the classroom. Retrieved July 14, 2012 from http://theedublogger.com/2011/04/03/the-complete-educators-guide-to-using-skype-effectively-in-the-classroom/


[1] Based on the author’s personal experience and opinion.

Friday, July 13, 2012


Personal Class Design Part II
by Alberta E.  Gudes, BSN, RN

Grand Canyon: NUR-649E: Nurse Education Seminar II
Professor Cherryl Llanos, MSN, RN
July 11, 2012

Note from the Author: This academic project was written with inspirations taken from the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center's Employee Education System.

Overview of Project 1
The project is a 4-hour training designed for clinicians with extensive exposure to different medical disciplines. They are physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, registered staff nurses, program support clerks, and licensed vocational nurses. They are pooled together into a team to a training program called TEACH in order to assist and improve Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) in hospitals or patient-centered public health centers. TEACH is an acronym for Tune, Explore, Assist, Communicate, and Honor, hence the training is called TEACH for PACT.
Members of the TEACH for PACT will provide information and insights to the training based on their present engagements within their own operating environment. This is based on the inspirations of Billings & Halstead (2009) quoting that the National League for Nursing (NLN) stated that in a rapidly-changing environment, where complex care is being provided in a variety of settings, clinicians must be offered new educations that are most effective in helping them in their practice.

LEARNER OBJECTIVES (Cognitive Domain)

General Objectives 

By the end of the training, members of the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) will comprehend each module of the TEACH program as a result of attending and actively participating in the activity sessions, be able to demonstrate learning to the other members of PACT for comments, and on the basis of these comments, will explain the same principles in their own words in a real or simulated situation for the training instructor to assess.

Specific Objectives

Based on the discussions during the training sessions, members are able to demonstrate in their own understanding the learning in each TEACH module.
·         T Module – Tune to the patient.
The PACT members are able to express in their own words on the processes of effective listening and questioning skills that would achieve the goal of being able to be attuned to the learner/patient engagement.
·         E Module – Explore the patient’s concerns and preferences.
The PACT members are able to explain to the learner/patient the principles by using examples from other context or situation so that their needs and preferences can be assessed.
·         A Module – Assist the patient in behavior changes.
The PACT members are able to apply health coaching strategies in order to assist learner/patient in coping with behavior changes using simulated patient scenarios.
·         C Module –Communicate effectively
The PACT members are able to translate their learning so that it fits to the level of understanding of the learner/patient, thus enabling the PAC Team handle the patient’s uncertainty and conflict.
·         H Module – Honor the patient as a partner.
The PACT members are able to show and explain in their own words the characteristics of teacher/clinician-learner/patient to succeed in partnering with patients.

LEARNER OBJECTIVES (Psychomotor Domain)

General Objectives 

By the end of the training, members of the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) will differentiate each module of the TEACH program as a result of attending and actively participating in the activity sessions, by showing their learning through performance indicators to the other members of PACT for comments, and on the basis of these comments, will identify the same principles in their own words in a real or simulated situation for the training instructor to assess.

Specific Objectives 

Based on the activities during the training sessions, members are able to duplicate in their own understanding the learning in each TEACH module.
·         T Module – Tune to the patient.
The PACT members are able to execute in their own style on the processes of effective listening and questioning skills that would achieve the goal of being able to be attuned to the learner/patient engagement.
·         E Module – Explore the patient’s concerns and preferences.
The PACT members are able to draw to the learner/patient the principles by using examples from other context or situation so that their needs and preferences can be assessed.
·         A Module – Assist the patient in behavior changes.
The PACT members are able to design health coaching strategies in order to assist learner/patient in coping with behavior changes using simulated patient scenarios.
·         C Module –Communicate effectively.
The PACT members are able to revise their learning so that it fits to the level of understanding of the learner/patient, thus enabling the PAC Team handle the patient’s uncertainty and conflict.
·         H Module – Honor the patient as a partner.
The PACT members are able to distinguish and explain in their own words the characteristics of teacher/clinician-learner/patient to succeed in partnering with patients.

OUTLINE

The following outline is taken entirely from Exclusive Class Design – Part 1:
Registration/Welcome/Introduction-registration will be sent by outlook e-mail; staff must register online and must sign in upon arrival to classroom.
1.      Introduction
2.      Explain TEACH objectives and expectations
3.      Provide students with a schedule/timeframe
4.      Patient education: TEACH for Success workbooks
a.          Distribute workbooks
b.      Explain workbooks and instructions
I.                   Teach T-Tune to the patient explanation.
This teaches centers on beginning effective rapport between clinicians and patients.  It helps partakers identify behaviors that help and hinder effective relationship, and it provides opportunities for partakers to practice effective listening and questioning skills.
II.                Teach E- Explore the patient’s concerns, preferences, and needs explanation.
This teaches partakers recognize all basics of a learning assessment.  It displays partakers how to use a range of needs assessment methods, and how to distinguish limits to learning as well as favorites for learning.
III.             Teach A- Assist the patient with behavior changes explanations.
This teaches partakers appreciate and use a health coaching tactic to assisting patients with behavior change with simulated patient scenarios.
IV.             Teach C- Communicate effectively explanation.
This teaches partakers how to fit their message to patients and how to deal with patient uncertainty and conflict.
V.                Teach H- Honor the patient as a partner explanation.
This teaches partakers identify features of real clinician-patient trusts and skills needed to successfully partner with patients.

CLASS TIME FRAME

Learner Objective
Timeframe
Teaching Strategy
Evaluation Method
T Module – Tune to the patient.



T Agenda 15 minutes -Review of key concept of teach T Module
10 minutes – Listening exercises
5 minutes -Applying learning to practice
Required time 30 minutes


Participants are grouped by three’s. One acts as the Listener, the second as the Talker and the third is Observer. Then, after the activity, the observer will report to the group what he/she observes.




The evaluation method to be applied in the activity is Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model for the entire process.
Also, another tool to be used is the PACT Compass. It is a data resources for primary care, which can be accessed at http://vssc.med.va.gov
Primary Care Almanac can also be utilized as an evaluation method for this activity.
E Module – Explore the patient’s concerns and preferences.


E Agenda 15 minutes-Review of key concept of teach E
10 minutes- Needs assessment practice
5 minutes – Applying learning to practice
Required time 30 minutes

Integrating elements of assessment by providing participants 2 different colored sticky notes. Participants would write factors that would lead them achieve their goals using the pink sticky note and the blue sticky note would be used for factors that hinder them from achieving their goals. After accomplishing the 2 colored sticky notes, participants are asked to read the notes before the class and let them place the notes corresponding to the parts of the human body like the head, heart and gut, arm and leg for the skills. Below the human body sketch is the environment, wherein participants could also put the sticky notes if it corresponds to the situation.

A Module - Assist the patient with behavior changes explanations.

A Agenda 15 minutes-Review of key concepts of teach A
10 minutes- Health coaching practice
5 minutes - Applying learning to practice
Required time 30 minutes


Participants are asked to create an action plan that would support them in coaching the patient’s life goals and values. They will distribute the action plan to other participants for feedback and discussion in front of the class.

C Module –Communicate effectively.

C Agenda 15 minutes- Tailoring messages
10 minutes – Dealing with patient uncertainty
5 minutes- Applying to practice
Required time 30 minutes

Participants are asked to list down and enumerate words and languages that would be used to communicate with the patients. They will role play the words to their fellow participants and determine how these words and languages affect them.

H Module – Honor the patient as a partner.

H Agenda 15 minutes-Review of key concepts of teach H
10 minutes-Partnering skills practice
5 minutes- Applying learning to practice
Required time 30 minutes
Participants are asked to group themselves in two’s. One will act as the Patient and the other is the Clinician. They will do an open dialogue on things that matter to the patient and the clinician that will build their trust with each other.


RATIONALE:

The writer chooses to use three evaluation methods namely the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA), PACT Compass and Primary Care Almanac with the hope that by using these methodologies, the objectives of the training can be met. According to Billings & Halstead (2009), “a variety of teaching strategies can be used to appeal to different learning styles and thus maximize student learning”.   From this concept, the best tool to be able to evaluate the outcomes of the different learning styles is to employ a combination of evaluation strategies as reflected in the class timeframe.  As Stavropoulou & Kelesi (2012) said that “Evaluation is becoming a necessary part of education, particularly in present times, when educational systems are subjected to continuous criticism and debate”. Henceforth, a combination of evaluation approaches becomes a necessary evil to ensure that outcomes are deeply rooted from evidence-based studies to make the training design and its processes reliable and solid.
The PDSA model is deemed to be an essential evaluation approach if taking into account the statement from the Institute of Innovation and Improvement of the National Health Services (NHS) in the United Kingdom saying that, “Using PDSA cycles enables one to test out changes before wholesale implementation and gives stakeholders the opportunity to see if the proposed change will work”. The NHS further said that “One may not get the results he expects when making changes to the processes, so it is safer and more effective to test out improvements on a small scale before implementing them across the board”. Thus, in this kind of training design, the writer believes that the PDSA model is just apt and appropriate.
The PACT Compass is also utilized as an evaluation tool in this training design because PACT Compass contains provider panel management, wherein all data relevant to patient care such as better access, better patient, satisfaction, better staff, the right care by the right person at the right time, can be found. This can be used to guide and check whether data achieved in the training can be improved by benchmarking the data from PACT Compass.
Likewise, the Primary Care Almanac is another helpful evaluation tool in the training since this resource contains data of patients for identification and management including one’s specific PACT-teamlets. Also, it is database of disease management like High risk, volume, and cost, Hypertension, Diabetes, Ischemic heart disease, Asthma, Depression, Obesity, Chronic Renal Failure and many more.
With all of the above approaches combined, there is a high percentage that the training design will achieve its intended goals successfully.

References

Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2009).Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty. St. Louis,
            Mo: Elsevier/Saunders.
Johnson, P., & Raterink, G. (2009). Implementation of a diabetes clinic-in-a-clinic project in a family practice setting: using the plan, do, study, act model. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 18(14), 2096-2103. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02774.x
MacKeracher, D. & Gross, P. (n.d.) Writing Learning Objectives. Retrieved on July 11, 2012 at http://www.unb.ca/fredericton/cetl/_resources/pdf/writinglearningobjectives.pdf
National Health Services (NHS).(n.d).  Institute of Innovation and Improvement. Retrieved July 11, 2012 at http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/plan_do_study_act.html
Stavropoulou, A., & Kelesi, M. (2012). Concepts and methods of evaluation in nursing education--a methodological challenge. Health Science Journal, 6(1), 11-23.

Application of Technology in Nursing and Patient Education
by Alberta E. Gudes, BSN, RN
 
There is no question even by mere practical observation that technology has changed civilization tremendously over time across international boundaries.  Its integration into diverse industries, commercial businesses, government and private institutions, and many more, has transformed service delivery to a level that has never ever been imagined several decades ago.  The magnitude of its impact to the world has re-engineered humanity’s lifestyle and this has not exempted the healthcare industry in making medical breakthroughs and simplified complicated tasks, which are but not limited to nursing and patient education. These for the end purpose that life can be preserved and taken care of the best way humans can possibly do. 

Using iPad Technology in Nursing and Patient Education

Technology has produced countless applications and devices in all forms and sizes.  To name a few are Netbooks, Smartphones, Laptops, iPods, iPads, and many more. For the purpose of this paper, the writer is singling out the iPad as a technology that is also affecting the nursing and patient education nowadays.  The iPad of Apple is a technology breakthrough that is brilliant in every sense of the word and is capable of so much more than one ever imagined (iPad, 2012), (PEM, 2011). Its retina display transforms the iPad experience so that everything looks and feels incredibly lifelike and detailed, becoming the best display ever in a mobile device. It contains the world’s most advance operating system with the most powerful and innovative built-in apps used in every day task (iPad, 2012).

Significance of the iPad Technology in Nursing and Patient Education

In the context of the nursing profession, the use of these technical wonders like the iPads, has in one way or the other helped nurses perform their duties and responsibilities better and faster with accuracy and lesser errors.  According to Patient Education Management (PEM, 2011), “Technology is improving the way patient managers oversee and offer education for patients. It can get the learners involved in the education process and provide a way to individualize teaching”. PEM added that, “A few years ago, educational materials were kept in a file drawer on hospital floors and clinics.  Now they are inventoried and distributed via the Intranet, keeping them up-to-date and readily available” (PEM, 2011).  Moreover, “instantaneous access to educational resources is being improved with the development of new handheld devices”, PEM (2011) stressed.

Supporting Rationale of iPad Technology in Nursing and Patient Education

But, the question of how significant the iPad is today in the nursing profession comes to mind. Eley et. al., (2008) said that, “Information Technology (IT) is no longer limited to specialized clinical areas and administrative services”.  They added that, “the potential benefits of IT use in the health care sector include the anticipated within any other industry or business as improved efficiency and communication” (Eley et. al., 2008).  Thus, if the use of iPads in the workplace especially in situations wherein nurse educators engaged themselves with patients as learners enhances efficiency and communications, then harnessing iPads vast potentials for improved overall performance is justifiably encompassing and something to reckon with. Tim Burrill, MBA, assistant administrator of Florida Hospital of Children in Orlando, said that “They have adopted the technology up front”, adding that “the iPad is very simple to use”.  PEM, (2011) also said, that “The Apple iPad, a handheld computing device, is used to educate children and adults with videos and illustrations”.   Educational videos with animated characters produced in-house, that describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans, were loaded on to the electronic device to prepare children for the procedure (PEM, 2011).  

Advantages of iPad Technology in Nursing and Patient Education

Another significance of the iPad is its ability to be able to inter-phase with apps, which is one of its promising strengths (Spencer & Lunsford, 2010).  Apps developers can create multimedia functionalities on iPad in order to demonstrate particular illnesses and other medical conditions.  This could be presented in a form of patient videos, animations, charts, diagrams or in any way that would ensure that patient care delivery is efficiently and effectively performed in accordance to the appropriate professional standards and competencies in nursing. With all these positive and endless capabilities of iPads as an electronic device to aid nurses, a healthcare professional’s engagement with his patient would result to better outcomes.

Disadvantages of iPad Technology in Nursing and Patient Education

On the other hand, iPad’s presence as an aid for medical professionals in the conduct of their functions does not guarantee that everything would be smooth sailing along the process.  There cannot be a one-size-fit-all device that would totally eliminate the possibilities of making errors as nurses dispose their duties and responsibilities.  As Sherman (2006) argued that "today's nursing work force contains members of three generational cohorts”, then the challenge that poses to be disadvantageous among nurses is the fact that there are still a number of nurse educators, whose literacy to the use of modern technology like the iPad is still somewhat in the downside. This can be one of the setbacks that can be noted or expected if the iPad technology would be adapted as part of nurse educators device to patients. 

Use of iPad Technology to Appropriate Professional Standards and Competencies
Also, another important component to consider when looking at the underlying implications of using the iPad technology is the cost that is associated with it versus benefits that it would offer across facilities.  Eley et. al., (2008) argued that “An additional goal of anticipated benefit of Information Technology within health care is to improve patient care in a cost effect manner”. Smith, (2004), also contended that there is a need to justify cost in proportion to the value of technology in its ability to enhance patient safety, retain nurses, provide more care time and support to strategic plans.  Smith, (2004)& Yusufu, (2008) further argued that “each new advancement and implementation of technology carries risks and cost with it.  Some of the risks include proof of efficacy for the nurse and the patient. There is a need to balance between cost of technology and the registered nurse (RN) resource adding that each proposed device and system has an attached competition for capital dollars and salary dollars”(Smith, 2004), (Yusufu, 2008).

Conclusion

On the final note, the writer of this paper argues that a thorough examination of the iPad as part of relevant technology devices to be used in nursing and patient education has to be given weight and consideration given the innumerable possibilities that it can offer to the healthcare industry.  In fact, one of these possibilities that pops up to the mind of the writer of this paper during the course of her research is the promising capability of the iPad to be used as a scanning device through the use of UpCode. An UpCode is an optical reader that uses mobile electronic device to add any electronic information and system printed on screens (UpCode, 2012). From this concept, patients can be assigned UpCode that can be scanned in their wristbands while on admission, inpatient and outpatient services. Through the use of iPads as the most convenient, user friendly and flexible device to use, a nurse can scan the UpCode so that instantly patients’ medical information can be accessed easily during nurse-patient engagement in the bedside, in the clinic or services in the facility.
Lastly, once the healthcare industry sees evidence-based data that would show the importance of the iPad expansively towards effective and efficient healthcare service delivery, then the costs that usually pose as a challenged can be far outweighed with its benefits.

References

Eley, R., Fallon, T., Soar, J., Buikstra, E., & Hegney, D. (2008). Nurses' confidence and experience in using information technology. Australian Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 25(3), 23-35.
iPad. (2012). Retrieved June 13, 2012, from http://www.apple.com/ipad/features/
Patient Education Management (PEM). (2011). Don't get left behind: iPads making strong inroads with patient education. (2011). Patient Education Management, 18(5), 49-51.
UpCode. (2012). Retrieved June 13, 2012, from http://www.itp.net/events/wm08/files/Vahid%20Amiripour.pdf
Sherman, R. (2006, May 31). Leading a multigenerational nursing workforce: Issues, challenges and strategies. Retrieved June 13, 2012, from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume112006/Number2May31/tpc30_216074.aspx
Smith, C. (2004). New technology continues to invade healthcare: what are the strategic implications/outcomes?Nursing Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 92-98.
Spencer, J., & Lunsford, V. (2010). Electronic documentation and the caring nurse-patient relationship. International Journal For Human Caring, 14(2), 30-35.
Robinson, S. (2011). TEACHING TECHNIQUES. Promote Active Learning with iPads. Radiologic Technology, 83(2), 204-207.
Yusufu, E. (2008). The need for in-service education units in nursing services departments. West African Journal Of Nursing, 19(1)